Case Results

Who Can Appeal a Federal Case?

The federal legal system is designed to ensure justice, but even well-run trials can result in errors or disputes that warrant further examination. When a party feels that justice wasn’t served, they may consider filing an appeal.

However, not everyone involved in a federal case can file an appeal, and the process is complex. Understanding who can appeal a federal case and the grounds for doing so can determine your next steps, along with the help of an attorney.

Who Can Appeal a Federal Case?

Not all parties in a federal case can file an appeal, and there are limits to what can be challenged. Generally, individuals or entities directly affected by a trial court’s decision have standing to appeal. This includes

Defendants in Criminal Cases

Defendants convicted of a federal crime can appeal if they believe legal errors, constitutional violations, or sentencing issues marred their trial. For instance, if a judge admitted inadmissible evidence or imposed a sentence that exceeded legal limits, the defendant may have grounds to challenge the decision.

However, the appeal must be based on identifiable errors in the trial record; simply disagreeing with the outcome is insufficient. For defendants, filing an appeal can mean the possibility of a new trial, a reduced sentence, or even overturning the conviction.

Prosecutors in Criminal Cases

The prosecution’s ability to appeal in federal criminal cases is more limited. They generally cannot appeal a not-guilty verdict due to constitutional protections against double jeopardy.

However, they can challenge certain rulings, such as the suppression of evidence or sentencing decisions, if those rulings are deemed legally erroneous.

These appeals often occur when the prosecution argues that the trial court misapplied the law in a way that impacts future cases.

Parties in Civil Cases

In civil cases, either party can appeal a judgment if they are dissatisfied with the trial court’s decision and believe an error affected the outcome. This includes disputes over the interpretation of statutes, the admissibility of evidence, or procedural issues that impacted the trial’s fairness.

What Are the Grounds for Filing a Federal Appeal?

Appeals focus on identifying errors in the trial court’s application of the law rather than rearguing the facts of the case. Common grounds for federal appeals include:

• Legal errors, such as incorrect jury instructions or improper admission of evidence
• Constitutional violations, such as denial of due process or unlawful searches
• Sentencing errors, like misapplication of federal sentencing guidelines or excessive sentences
• Procedural irregularities, including errors in jury selection or mishandling of pre-trial motions

How Does the Federal Appeals Process Work?

The federal appeals process is designed to ensure that the law was applied correctly in the trial court. Below is an overview of the key steps:

1. Filing a Notice of Appeal

Strict procedural rules govern the process regardless of who is filing the appeal. Appeals must generally be initiated within 30 days of the trial court’s judgment in civil cases or 14 days in criminal cases.

The appellant must also ensure all necessary documentation, including a notice of appeal and relevant trial records, is filed on time to avoid forfeiting their right to appeal.

2. Preparing the Trial Record and Briefs

The trial record includes all transcripts, evidence, and documents from the original case. The brief is a written argument submitted by the appellant (the party filing the appeal) explaining why the trial court’s decision should be reversed. The opposing party files a response brief defending the trial court’s ruling.

3. Oral Arguments

In some cases, the appellate court schedules oral arguments where lawyers for both sides present their positions and answer the judges’ questions. However, many appeals are decided based solely on the written briefs and trial record.

4. Possible Outcomes of the Court’s Decision

After reviewing the case, the appellate court issues a written decision, which may:

Affirm

One possible outcome is that the appellate court affirms the lower court’s decision, meaning it agrees with the trial court’s ruling and upholds the original judgment. In this case, the trial court’s verdict remains in effect, and any sentences or judgments imposed are enforced.

Reversal

Alternatively, the appellate court may reverse the lower court’s decision, finding that a significant legal error occurred that impacted the trial’s outcome. A reversal often leads to the dismissal of charges, a new trial, or a modified judgment, depending on the nature of the error.

Remand

Sometimes, the appellate court may remand the case back to the trial court for further proceedings. A remand typically occurs when the appellate judges identify errors that need correction but believe the trial court is best equipped to address them, such as reevaluating evidence or issuing a new sentence.

Why Work with An Appellate Attorney?

Navigating a federal appeal requires a precise understanding of appellate law, strict procedural deadlines, and the ability to craft persuasive legal arguments. Experienced appellate attorneys specialize in identifying trial errors, writing compelling briefs, and strategically presenting cases to appellate judges.

Their knowledge ensures that key arguments are communicated effectively to increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome. Without professional guidance, you could risk procedural missteps and missed opportunities to challenge critical trial court decisions.

Questions about Appeals? Contact Harrison & Hart LLC

Filing a federal appeal is not about dissatisfaction with a verdict but about identifying and challenging legal or procedural errors. Only specific parties can appeal, and the grounds must be rooted in legal errors or violations of rights.

Given the high stakes and complexities of federal appeals, working with an experienced appellate lawyer is essential. Harrison & Hart LLC is highly experienced in federal appeals and dedicated to helping clients navigate this challenging process.

Contact us today or call 505-295-3261 for a consultation.

How Does the New Mexico Court of Appeals Work?

The New Mexico Court of Appeals is critical to the state’s judicial system. It reviews decisions made by lower courts to ensure the law was applied correctly. The court handles both civil and criminal appeals, providing a crucial step for those seeking to challenge a trial court’s ruling.

Here’s what you need to know about the Court of Appeals, the appellate process, and the potential outcomes.

What Is the New Mexico Court of Appeals?

The New Mexico Court of Appeals is an intermediate appellate court that reviews decisions made by lower trial courts to ensure the correct application of law. It hears civil and criminal appeals, except for cases like death penalty matters.

How Is the NM Court of Appeals Structured?

The New Mexico Court of Appeals is comprised of 10 judges who sit in panels to review cases. These judges are divided between Santa Fe and Albuquerque.

The court is structured to handle appeals efficiently, with the panels rotating to ensure a fair distribution of the caseload. Cases are generally assigned randomly, and the panels consist of three judges each.

What Do Court of Appeals Judges Do?

Unlike trial courts, appellate judges do not re-examine witnesses or consider new evidence. Instead, they focus on whether legal errors were made in the original case. The judges review the written briefs, the trial court record, and any oral arguments presented. The panel will then issue a written opinion explaining their decision.

What Types of Cases Does the NM Court of Appeals Hear?

The court has jurisdiction over most civil and criminal appeals. Civil cases can range from family law disputes to business litigation, while criminal appeals often involve issues such as wrongful convictions or sentencing errors.

However, some cases—such as capital punishment appeals and cases involving public regulation— bypass the Court of Appeals and go straight to the New Mexico Supreme Court.

What Is the Appellate Process in the New Mexico Court of Appeals?

The appellate process begins with the filing of a notice of appeal. This document notifies the court and the opposing party that you intend to challenge the lower court’s decision.

Afterward, both parties submit briefs, written arguments explaining their position. The appellant argues why the decision should be overturned, while the appellee defends the original ruling. In some cases, oral arguments may be scheduled, allowing attorneys to present their case before the judges. However, many appeals are decided based solely on the written briefs.

How to File an Appeal in New Mexico

To file an appeal, there must be legal grounds to claim that an error occurred during the trial. These could include mistakes in applying the law, procedural errors, or insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s decision.

Appeals must be filed within a specific time frame, typically 30 days from the final judgment in the lower court. Missing this deadline can result in the loss of the right to appeal.

What Are the Possible Outcomes of an Appeal?

The New Mexico Court of Appeals has several options when deciding a case. The court can affirm the lower court’s ruling, meaning they agree with the original decision and the case is over.

Alternatively, they can reverse the decision, which may result in a new trial or the case being sent back to the lower court (remanded) for further proceedings. Sometimes, the court may modify the ruling without sending it back to the lower court, adjusting aspects like damages or sentencing.

What Types of Opinions Can Be Issued?

The court may issue one of three types of opinions:

• Published opinions establish precedent and can be cited as binding authority in future cases. They are carefully written and thoroughly reasoned, often addressing novel legal issues or clarifying existing law.
• Unpublished opinions resolve the case at hand but do not establish binding precedent. While these opinions are not published in official reporters, they are typically available online and can be persuasive in future cases.
• Memorandum opinions are brief decisions that dispose of the case without extensive legal analysis. They are used when the court believes a full opinion is unnecessary due to settled law or clear facts.

How Long Does the Appeals Process Take in New Mexico?

The process can take anywhere from six months to two years or more, depending on the complexity of the case and the court’s caseload.  Several factors can influence the timeline, such as delays in filing briefs, the need for oral arguments, and how quickly the panel reaches a decision.

Do You Need a Lawyer for an Appeal?

While you aren’t required to have a lawyer in an appeal, working with one can make all the difference in achieving a favorable outcome. Many appeals are lost due to technical mistakes or failure to meet deadlines. An attorney with extensive legal knowledge can craft persuasive briefs and present compelling oral arguments on your behalf to improve your chances of success.

Questions about an Appeal in New Mexico? Call Harrison & Hart, LLC Today

Whether you’re facing a civil or criminal appeal in New Mexico, understanding the court’s process can help you navigate this complex system.

If you’re considering an appeal in New Mexico, our experienced appellate attorneys at Harrison & Hart, LLC can help. We’ll guide you through each step of the process and fight for the best possible outcome in your case.

Call 505-295-3261 today or contact us to schedule an initial consultation.

Who Investigates Federal Crimes?

Federal crimes, unlike state offenses, involve violations of laws passed by the U.S. Congress. These crimes can range from drug trafficking and organized crime to financial fraud and terrorism. Various federal agencies are tasked with this responsibility, each with its own jurisdiction and area of expertise.

When Are Crimes Charged at the Federal Level?

investigates cases are distinct from state crimes in that they are prosecuted by the federal government, while state crimes are prosecuted by state or local authorities. Some offenses commonly charged at the federal level include:

• Drug trafficking: The illegal production, distribution, or possession of controlled substances.
• Cybercrime: Crimes committed using computers or the internet, such as hacking, identity theft, and fraud.
• White-collar crimes: Non-violent crimes such as embezzlement, fraud, and tax evasion.
• Terrorism: The unlawful use of violence or intimidation, often with political goals.

What Agencies Investigate Federal Offenses?

Because these cases are complex and often high-stakes, several federal agencies are responsible for investigating them.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

The Federal Bureau of Investigation, commonly known as the FBI, is perhaps the most well-known U.S. federal agency. From counterterrorism and cybercrime to corruption and organized crime, the FBI is at the forefront of protecting the United States from serious threats.

For example, the FBI investigates cases involving national security, such as terrorism and espionage, as well as crimes that cross state lines, like human trafficking and large-scale fraud.

Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) focuses on combating drug-related crimes. Its primary mission is to enforce the controlled substances laws and regulations of the United States. This includes investigating major drug trafficking organizations, dismantling drug cartels, and preventing the illegal distribution of narcotics.

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) is responsible for enforcing federal laws related to the illegal use and trafficking of firearms, explosives, alcohol, and tobacco products. The agency also investigates cases of arson and bombings, particularly when these acts are tied to criminal organizations or terrorism.

Common federal crimes investigated by the ATF include firearms trafficking, illegal possession of explosives, and arson committed as part of insurance fraud schemes.

U.S. Secret Service

The U.S. Secret Service is best known for its role in protecting the President and other high-ranking officials. However, the agency also investigates federal crimes, particularly those involving financial fraud and counterfeiting. The Secret Service was originally established in 1865 to combat the widespread counterfeiting of U.S. currency, and it continues to focus on this area today.

In addition to counterfeiting, the Secret Service investigates a range of financial crimes, including credit card fraud, identity theft, and cybercrime. The agency’s dual mission of protection and investigation allows it to address threats to both individuals and the financial system.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is a federal agency primarily responsible for enforcing immigration laws and investigating customs violations. ICE’s investigative arm, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), is involved in a wide array of federal crime investigations, from human trafficking and child exploitation to illegal arms exports and immigration fraud.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Criminal Investigation Division

The IRS Criminal Investigation Division (IRS-CI) is the law enforcement arm of the Internal Revenue Service. The division focuses on investigating financial crimes, particularly those involving tax evasion, filing false tax returns, money laundering, and other forms of financial fraud. IRS-CI agents are often involved in high-profile cases where individuals or organizations attempt to conceal income or launder illicit funds.

Other Federal Agencies

In addition to the major agencies mentioned above, several other federal entities play important roles in investigating federal crimes. The U.S. Marshals Service, for instance, is responsible for apprehending fugitives, transporting federal prisoners, and protecting witnesses in federal cases. The Marshals Service also enforces federal court orders and assists in the recovery of assets obtained through criminal activities.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is another key agency, investigating violations of securities laws, including insider trading, securities fraud, and market manipulation.

How Do These Agencies Work Together?

Given the complexity of many federal crimes, it’s common for multiple agencies to work together on investigations. This coordination is crucial in cases that span multiple jurisdictions or involve various types of criminal activity. For instance, a major drug trafficking case might involve the DEA, FBI, and ATF, while a financial fraud case could see collaboration between the FBI, IRS-CI, and SEC.

Charged at the Federal Level? Call Harrison & Hart Today

The world of federal law enforcement is complex. If you are facing a federal investigation or have been accused of a federal crime, don’t hesitate to contact Harrison & Hart. Our experienced attorneys can provide you with the guidance and representation you need to navigate the federal legal system.

Call 505-295-3261 or contact us today to schedule an initial consultation.

New Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Can You Get a Sentence Reduction?

In August 2023, the U.S. Sentencing Commission made significant changes to the federal sentencing guidelines that could result in shorter prison sentences for thousands of individuals. If you have a loved one who is currently incarcerated or awaiting sentencing, it’s crucial to understand these revisions and how they might impact their case.

If you believe your loved one may qualify for a sentence reduction under the updated guidelines, seek legal assistance from an experienced criminal defense attorney at Harrison & Hart. We can review your loved one’s case, determine their eligibility, and guide you through the process of applying for a reduced sentence.

Understand the Key Changes

The most notable update relates to how a defendant’s criminal history is factored into their sentence. Previously, individuals with no prior criminal records (known as “zero-point offenders”) were treated the same as those with criminal histories when calculating their sentencing range.

However, under the new federal guidelines, zero-point offenders whose offenses did not involve aggravating factors like violence or firearms will have their offense levels reduced by two levels. This change could potentially reduce sentences by months or even years for some offenders.

When Will the Changes Take Effect?

The new amendments went into effect on November 1, 2023, for those awaiting sentencing. For individuals already incarcerated, the changes applied retroactively starting on February 1, 2024. The three-month delay was intended to allow those released early to receive necessary reentry programs and transitional services, promoting their successful reintegration into society and enhancing public safety.

Who Can Seek a Reduced Sentence?

The amendments aim to increase fairness and reduce overly harsh sentences, particularly for non-violent, first-time offenders. Those convicted of lower-level drug offenses or white-collar crimes are among those who could benefit the most from these changes.

However, not everyone will qualify for a sentence reduction. To be eligible, defendants must meet specific criteria, including:

• Having no prior criminal history points
• Not having committed offenses involving terrorism, hate crimes, sex offenses, civil rights violations, or continuing criminal enterprises
• Not having caused death, serious injury, or substantial financial hardship in connection with the offense
• Not having possessed or used firearms or other dangerous weapons during the offense

If your loved one meets these qualifications, they may be eligible for a reduced sentence under the new guidelines.

How Will These Changes Help?

The updates to the federal sentencing guidelines don’t just impact future cases – they also provide a path for thousands of currently incarcerated individuals to potentially get their sentences reduced retroactively.

However, implementing retroactive sentence reductions is a major undertaking. The U.S. Sentencing Commission recognized that the courts and prison system would need adequate time to review petitions and prepare for the safe release and reentry of those receiving reduced sentences.

That’s why they built in a 3-month delay, setting the effective date for retroactive application as February 1, 2024. This will allow all parties involved – judges, lawyers, prison officials, and more – to get ready for the changes.

How Many People Will Be Affected?

So how many people might benefit from getting their sentences reduced retroactively? According to the Commission’s estimates from July 2023:

• 11,495 currently incarcerated individuals could have their sentencing range lowered under the “status points” provisions, resulting in an average 11.7% reduction in their sentence lengths.
• 7,272 currently incarcerated individuals are expected to be eligible for reduced sentencing ranges as “zero-point offenders” with no prior criminal histories. For them, the average sentence reduction could be a substantial 17.6%.

These numbers represent thousands of people, many of them likely non-violent offenders, who may get a second chance thanks to the revised guidelines promoting more proportional sentencing.

The Commission carefully analyzed this issue from all angles before voting to apply the changes retroactively. They reviewed data, heard testimony from experts and stakeholders across the legal system, and ultimately concluded that reducing excessive sentences would increase fairness while maintaining public safety.

Get Help from a Criminal Defense Attorney with Harrison & Hart Today

At Harrison & Hart LLC, our team of dedicated attorneys is well-versed in the intricacies of the federal sentencing guidelines and committed to fighting for the rights of our clients and their families. We understand the profound impact these changes can have on your loved one’s future, and we’re here to help you navigate this opportunity.

Contact us today at (505) 295-3261 for a free consultation and let us explore the possibilities of a reduced sentence for your loved one under the new federal sentencing guidelines.

What Is a Federal Grand Jury?

You’ve probably heard about the important role of the grand jury in major news stories or legal dramas. But what exactly is a grand jury, and what do they do in federal cases? You may be surprised to learn that grand juries are one of two types of juries that operate at the federal level, each serving unique functions.

Learn more about the grand jury’s purpose, powers, proceedings, and its role in the federal justice system.

When Is a Case Brought Before a Federal Grand Jury?

The right to grand jury indictment is constitutionally required in federal felony cases. Felonies that can be charged at the federal level include white collar crimes, drug trafficking, fraud, or violent crimes.

Who Serves on a Federal Grand Jury?

A federal grand jury is composed of 16 to 23 jurors drawn from the district where the federal court is held. Jurors typically serve around 18 months, but can serve up to 24 months if a judge grants an extension. As with any jury, the selection process aims to produce a group that represents a fair cross-section of the community.

How Does a Federal Grand Jury Work?

The primary function of a federal grand jury is to investigate potential federal offenses and determine whether there is enough evidence to bring formal charges, known as an indictment, against a suspect. Unlike petit juries, which decide the guilt or innocence of a defendant during a trial, grand juries do not determine guilt. Instead, they decide whether there is probable cause to proceed with a prosecution. Grand juries do not meet every day and will hear multiple cases during their term of service.

Broad Powers

A federal grand jury holds expansive authority due to its constitutional role in the justice system. It can initiate investigations without probable cause or suspicion of a crime based on information from any source, including the grand jurors’ own knowledge. This autonomy allows the grand jury to conduct thorough investigations and operate free of the constraints typically required in criminal investigations.

Secrecy Rules

Grand jury proceedings are secret. The only people allowed in the room are the jurors, the prosecutors presenting the case, the court reporter, and witnesses when they testify. This confidentiality is intended to protect the reputation of the accused if they aren’t indicted, protect the jurors, and encourage witnesses to speak freely.

There are some exceptions to the secrecy rules of a federal grand jury. For example, basic demographic juror information isn’t confidential, and disclosure of some information can be authorized to assist foreign investigations. Courts can also authorize disclosures for national security or public interest reasons.

The accused may have limited access to grand jury materials for their defense. Some transcripts may eventually become public records; however, these exceptions are carefully considered to balance competing interests.

Federal Grand Jury Process

The Administrative Office of the United States Courts provides a Grand Juror Handbook with helpful information outlining what to expect in the grand jury process. Federal grand jury proceedings usually follow these steps:

Evidence Presentation and Witness Questioning

The prosecutor, representing the government, presents evidence and calls witnesses to testify before the grand jury. Jurors are active participants in building the case, not passive receivers of information. The jury can request to hear from additional witnesses and or ask for more evidence.

Grand jury witnesses are usually subpoenaed to appear, and a witness’s attorney cannot be present in the room when they testify. Failing to comply with a subpoena is grounds for holding a witness in contempt.

Deliberation and Voting

After hearing all the evidence, the grand jury deliberates in secret. The prosecutor is barred from these deliberations. This independent deliberation highlights the unique role of the grand jury.

For an indictment to be issued, a majority of jurors must agree there is probable cause. In the federal system, at least 12 jurors must vote in favor of an indictment.

Possible Outcomes

If the grand jury finds sufficient evidence and determines the accused should be put on trial, it issues an indictment against the defendant. The indictment is then sealed until the defendant is arrested or appears voluntarily before the court.

If there’s insufficient evidence, the grand jury can decide not to indict. The prosecutor can still pursue charges through a different process depending on the case. They can resubmit the charges if new evidence emerges.

Facing Federal Charges? Call Harrison & Hart, LLC Today

If you are the target of a federal grand jury investigation or learn you’ve been subpoenaed to testify, it’s crucial to understand your rights and work with an experienced criminal defense attorney.

Even though an attorney cannot be present if you testify, a lawyer can help you prepare for what’s to come and fight to protect your rights.  Our legal team at Harrison & Hart, LLC will hear your questions and concerns and provide honest advice and guidance based on our years of practice.

Call (505) 295-3261 or contact us today to schedule an initial consultation.

What Constitutes Illegal Search and Seizure in New Mexico?

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the privacy of all citizens. You have a right against unreasonable searches and seizures of your personal property from your person, home, business, and other places where you can reasonably expect privacy. There are legal safeguards to protect your privacy against illegal searches and seizures.

New Mexico Search and Seizure Laws

Both state and federal laws protect you against illegal searches and seizures. You cannot be searched, and your property cannot be taken unless law enforcement has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed.

However, specific wording in the New Mexico state constitution makes the application of this 4^th Amendment right unique. This wording led to a definitive ruling in the case State v. Gomez.

Because of this case and others, “application of the New Mexico Constitution’s protections regarding search and seizure can lead to better outcomes for criminal defendants than the application of the Fourth Amendment protections enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.” In other words, the New Mexico Constitution offers you more protection than does the U.S. Constitution.

When Is a Warrant Needed?

In most situations, law enforcement must have a search warrant to search a person or their property and seize property.

If an officer has information that indicates you may be involved in a crime, they must seek a warrant from the court. Their request must have enough information to show probable cause that a crime was committed.

If officers want to search a specific person or location, they must have information showing that the person or place was involved in the crime. A police officer cannot just get a warrant based on a hunch.

Exceptions to When a Warrant is Needed

There are some exceptions to when a warrant is necessary, including:

• The circumstances are emergent
• The search will protect law enforcement or others from immediate harm
• Evidence is in plain view of an officer
• An officer is making an inventory of things collected during an arrest (all other regulations must be followed)
• The person voluntarily consented to a search

If any exceptions apply, a police officer or investigator may perform a search. If they find illegal objects, they can seize them under these circumstances.

When Is a Search and Seizure Illegal?

A search and seizure is illegal if an officer does not have probable cause that a crime has been committed. If they do not have a warrant to search you and there is no specifically mentioned circumstance as an exception, then any search and seizure may be illegal.

What Happens to Evidence Found Illegally?

Evidence recovered as the result of an illegal search and seizure may be excluded from the case. It would be considered inadmissible because it was obtained illegally.

Evidence obtained from an illegal search and seizure is called “fruit of the poisonous tree.” The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine excludes illegally obtained evidence.

Your criminal defense attorney can file a motion to exclude evidence obtained illegally. Without that evidence, the prosecutor may not have enough information to support your charges. If that is the case, then your charges may be dismissed.

It’s important to know that there are ways law enforcement can keep this evidence in a case. For example, if the prosecutor can prove it would have been discovered naturally regardless of the illegal search, it may be allowed to stay. You must work with a lawyer who can dispute these claims.

What to Do If You Believe You’ve Been Illegally Searched

It can be hard to challenge the validity of a search and seizure. You will need to have solid proof that your rights were violated.

You may be able to obtain evidence, including the officer’s body camera, eyewitness statements, and the police report. You will likely have to fight against the claims of the law enforcement officer.

If you think you were illegally searched, you should immediately contact a criminal defense attorney and tell them what happened. Write down exactly what happened and collect as much information as possible. Provide your lawyer with as many facts as possible.

Contact Harrison & Hart, LLC Today

If your constitutional rights have been violated, you have options regarding how to proceed. Your best step is to contact a criminal defense lawyer at Harrison & Hart, LLC. We will immediately start working on your case and ensure your rights are protected.

Call us today at (505) 295-3261 or contact us online to schedule a consultation.

What Is a Drug Conspiracy Charge?

Drug conspiracy includes an array of drug-related activities. Federal charges result in decades in prison, significant fines, and other severe penalties. You should avoid these charges at all costs.

Types of Drug Conspiracy Charges

Federal drug conspiracy is a crime that may or may not actually involve handling drugs. The government must simply prove that:

1. There was an agreement between two or more people to break a federal drug law
2. You knew about the conspiracy and knowingly joined it

You don’t need to have completed the criminal offense to be convicted of drug conspiracy. You must have had intent to commit the crime.

Manufacturing a Controlled Substance 

One of the most common federal drug conspiracy offenses involves manufacturing a controlled substance. This may include growing, processing, extracting, or producing illegal drugs.

Distributing a Controlled Substance 

Planning (or conspiring) to deliver illegal drugs to another person may be considered distributing a controlled substance. You don’t have to exchange money to get convicted of drug conspiracy under the distribution of a controlled substance. Any distribution qualifies under this law, including fake prescriptions, online drug pharmacies, and delivering illegal drugs to another person.

Possessing a Controlled Substance with the Intent to Distribute It

Simple drug possession involves having it on your person or within your control. However, the government may try to prove that you conspired to distribute the drugs or sell them. You may be charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs if you also possess baggies, scales, or other evidence of drug sales.

Importation of a Controlled Substance

Conspiracy to import illegal drugs may involve bringing a controlled substance into the United States from another country — this may take place by plane, boat, or roadway. The larger the operation, the more likely you will get the maximum penalties.

Consequences of Drug Conspiracy Charges

The penalties for federal drug conspiracy convictions depend on the amount and type of drug involved in the crime.

Marijuana

• No alleged amount – up to 40 years in federal prison
• 100 kg or more – between five and 40 years in federal prison
• 1,000 kg or more – between 10 and 40 years in federal prison

Heroin

• 100 kg or more – between five and 40 years in federal prison
• 1 kg or more – between 10 and 40 years in federal prison

Cocaine and Crack Cocaine

• 500 g or more of cocaine or 28 g or more of crack – between five and 40 years in federal prison
• 5 kg or more of cocaine or 280 g or more of crack – between 10 and 40 years in federal prison

Methamphetamine

• Less than 5 g – up to 20 years in federal prison
• 5 g or more – between five and 40 years in federal prison
• 50 g or more – 10 years up to life in prison

Opioids and GHB (including ketamine and fentanyl)

• Up to 20 years in federal prison
• Enhanced penalties involving death or serious injury to another person
• Enhanced penalties for any prior felony drug convictions

Possible Defenses to Drug Conspiracy Charges

Many of the defenses against drug conspiracy charges are similar to those that can be used in other criminal cases. Those include:

• Illegal search or seizure
• Lack of valid search warrant
• Law enforcement exceeded search warrant
• Law enforcement failed to read your Miranda rights
• You were denied legal counsel after a request
• Law enforcement entrapped you in a conspiracy situation

However, some unique defense tactics can be used with conspiracy charges. For example, conspiracy is a “specific intent” crime. That means you must have had actual knowledge and intent to commit the crime. It is not required that you committed the crime. However, you must have purposefully conspired to commit the crime.

Also, if you withdrew from the conspiracy before the crime occurred, you can use this to your benefit. This would be an especially strong defense if you worked with law enforcement against the conspiracy.

Contact a Drug Conspiracy Lawyer Right Away

If the government charges you with federal drug conspiracy, they have likely already conducted an investigation and have significant evidence against you. You must hire a drug crime lawyer immediately to get someone on your side to protect your rights. You need an independent investigation and practical assistance from your counsel.

Call Harrison & Hart, LLC today at (505) 295-3261 or contact us online to schedule a case consultation.

How Long Is a Federal Sentence for Money Laundering?

Money laundering is a federal white-collar crime that can result in significant penalties, including decades in prison. The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 establishes details of this crime and consequences that defendants may face for violating the law. Under federal law, you could face up to 20 years in prison and hefty fines.

What Is Money Laundering?

Money laundering occurs when an individual disguises the source, amount, or destination of money obtained by illegal means. This often happens through bank transfers and interactions with legitimate businesses. Funds are usually obtained through embezzlement, fraud, drug trafficking, or other unlawful activities.

Money laundering is often associated with other crimes, such as racketeering, tax evasion, credit card fraud, cryptocurrency crimes, and white-collar crimes that may be added or lesser included charges.

Domestic Money Laundering

Domestic money laundering is often associated with false organizational operations. An individual may form a business and transfer money between domestic bank accounts. The more money is transferred, the harder it is to track. To avoid money laundering charges, it’s important to carefully track every penny in personal and business accounts.

International Money Laundering

Many money laundering activities take place between domestic and international bank accounts. International bank accounts are more difficult to track. This makes it easier for an individual to hide the source, amount, and destination of money. International money laundering may result in criminal charges in more than one country.

Undercover “Sting” Laundering Operations

If the government suspects money laundering is occurring, they may set up an undercover “sting” operation. A sting operation creates a situation where an individual may take part in money laundering where they would not otherwise. Sting operations are often considered “entrapment,” where the police persuade an individual into illegal activity.

Federal Sentencing for Money Laundering

There is no mandatory minimum sentence for federal money laundering charges. However, the penalties can be severe. The government views money laundering very harshly.

A money laundering conviction could result in up to 20 years in federal prison. Additionally, you will likely face a fine of up to $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved in the laundering, whichever is greater.

Money laundering convictions are often combined with other charges, such as racketeering. By combining the offenses, you may face even stricter penalties.

Sentencing Factors

Although the maximum penalty for money laundering is significant, it is unlikely that a person will receive the harshest consequences unless aggravating factors are present. If you are a first-time offender, your criminal defense lawyer can present mitigating factors to lessen your sentence.

Some mitigating factors that may make your sentence less harsh include:

• This is your first criminal offense
• You can quickly pay all fines and restitution
• You opt for alternative punishments like community service
• You weren’t aware of the circumstances surrounding the crime
• You didn’t know the source of the money
• Extent you worked with or assisted law enforcement
• Lack of knowledge of specific facts
• Whether you take a plea bargain or go to trial

Aggravating factors can also make your sentence worse, up to the maximum length of time in prison. Those aggravating factors include:

• Extent to which you were involved in the crime
• Knowledge of what took place
• Involvement of other individuals in the crime
• Length of time the activities occurred

Defending Against Money Laundering Charges

Your money laundering defense attorney can attack the allegations against you in many ways. Some common defenses and strategies used include:

• There was no underlying criminal conduct
• You did not have the requisite intent to commit the crime
• You did not know that the money was from an illegal source
• There was an illegal search and seizure
• You were not read Miranda rights
• You were not provided with legal counsel when requested

Any illegally obtained evidence, including your own statements, may be excluded from the case. If the judge grants a motion to exclude evidence, the prosecution may not have enough information to sustain charges against you, and your case may be dismissed.

A Criminal Defense Lawyer Can Help

Money laundering charges result in severe penalties that seriously affect your private and professional life. You need to work with a white-collar crime lawyer who can protect your legal rights and reputation.

Call Harrison & Hart, LLC today at (505) 295-3261 or contact us online to schedule a consultation.